My Doctor Who series 8 Rant

Below is a bit of a rant after watching the final episode of this series of Doctor Who. If you’ve not watched the series there are some spoilers below.

I have to confess the conclusion of series 8 of Nu-Who has left me with mixed feelings. On the one hand I think we have a terrific new Doctor in the cranky almost permanently angry Peter Capaldi but on the other hand we’ve had some truly dreadful episodes. So while I have loved the new Doctor I have to say this series as a whole I have found to be deeply disappointing compared with the previous seven. One thing I think I haven’t liked is that now DW is on far too late. It’s meant to be a family show yet most of the episodes for this series were starting at 8.30 which is not far off the ‘watershed’ for adult programmes. And yes this series has been dark but so were some of the stories from the Hartnell and Troughton days and those weren’t shown this late in the evening. You can be dark and still keep your audience. Plus there is some vim and vigour missing from this series. Previous series have made a big thing about running. This series I don’t think there’s been any. Well maybe in one episode. So maybe that accounts for a rather staid feel to this series.

There also seems to have been the usual problem of a terrific build up followed by a horrendously pat climax. The episode ‘Listen’ for instance is a great example of this. There was a really great hook to this episode, something unseen watching, listening to people. The wonderfully creepy scene in the child’s bedroom with the ‘thing’ under the bed clothes. Really unsettling. The build-up in this was superb. Then the ending was a little bit ‘oh it was all a dream tra-la-la’. AAARRRGGGHHHH. The build up with Missy was very erratic as well. The first couple of episodes she was there then she was forgotten about for a bit, then back again, then forgotten again, oh and now she’s back again. So by the time we got to the climax it didn’t really feel like it had been building towards this over the entire series. Another thing Moffat does is seem to forget plot points. At the end of Matt Smith’s run we came back to the mention of ‘the woman in the shop’ who gave Clara the Doctor’s number. In the final episode it was even mentioned again, this time making out that The Master had put the two together for a reason. Oooh interesting. This was then promptly forgotten about and if the conclusion of the episode is the final goodbye it seemed to be for Clara this plot point which was built up into a potential major element will never go anywhere. Moffat is the master of building towers he never intends to finish which for me is really infuriating.

Making The Master a woman, even if it was only for this series was a stupid idea. It made no sense especially when you consider where we last saw The Master when he faced off with Rassilon. If only they had been a bit more ballsy and had Michelle Gomez, who was absolutely superb, as a corrupted Romana, going after the Doctor because of what he ‘did’ to Gallifrey in the time war, (something we now know to be not true) could have been absolutely fantastic. Or if they had to bring a character back why not the Rani? But no, we have the gimmick of making a male time lord (a character who for 40 years has been a bloke) suddenly become a woman for no justifiable reason whatsoever. No matter how awesome Michelle Gomez was I still think it’s a naff idea. It’s almost as if Moffat is trying to justify saying to people that it might be okay now to have a female Doctor. It won’t. The Doctor is a bloke. The end. It’s not even an argument. In the same way John Shaft is not a white guy, The Doctor is not a woman.

Clara got some great material in this series, probably meatier stuff than any previous companion has had but it was all just a little bit too contrived. Or at least it felt that way. Suddenly she’s a teacher at a school who nips out for long adventures between classes? And because she travels through time and space no one else is the wiser. Really? Ugghhh what a terrible idea. Danny Pink was rather a well-played character but I never really got any feel for chemistry between them. Plus he was an annoying character to be brought in as a boyfriend and then take him away right at the end. It seemed a waste, especially as his conflict/disdain with the Doctor was awesome. I would have loved to have seen that continue.

Am I the only one who misses the days when the Doctor would get a companion, disappear for a few years with them going here there and everywhere never being tied back to on recurring place and then they say goodbye and he goes off to find someone new? I can’t be can I?

I was left feeling a little bit, ‘was that it?’ when the credits rolled on this series.

So an annoying series, full of a mixture of terrible episodes and terrific episodes. Some bad ideas and some wonderful ones (The Brigadier as Cyberman saluting and finally being saluted was f**king brilliant) and we’re kind of right back to where we were last Christmas, with the Doctor finally remembering that he was going to try and find Gallifrey, something that he never really mentioned for this entire series until right at the very end. Which will now be forgotten about because the next episode is the Christmas special.

I didn’t really like this series. Once I get the DVD box set (I have all the others so I will be buying this too) I imagine this will become the least watched of my collection. But that by no means I will stop watching. You can’t please everyone all of the time so just because I didn’t like everything in this series doesn’t mean I’m about to throw my toys out of my pram and give up on it. That’s never going to happen. I’ll be watching at Christmas and next year when series nine is on. Hoping for a return to form, for something better. We have a great new Doctor we just need a great new series to match him.

P.S. Moffat sort out the theme tune, it sounded like a whiny cat getting put through a washing machine rather than the Doctor Who theme.

UNIVERSAL SOLDIER: DAY OF RECKONING - film review

There is not a lot of love on the internet for this movie so it’s time to redress the balance somewhat.

The original Universal Soldier (UniSol) movie was released back in ‘92 and was a big bit of B movie fun. The sequel, Universal Soldier: The Return came out in 1999. No Lundgren this time but JCVD was still in there and joined by Michael Jai White and pro-wrestler Bill Goldberg. The film is a 78 minute waste of time and appeared to be the death of the UniSol franchise.

Fast forward to 2010, John Hyams (son of Peter Hyams, who made 2010 and Timecop) was hired to make a low budget straight to video sequel which was going to have the original stars appear (Lundgren sadly is only onscreen for about 15 minutes as he was filming some movie with Stallone and The Stath at the time) but the main lead would be MMA fight Andrei ‘The Pitbull’ Arlovski as a new generation of UniSol known as the NGU. This film, which became Universal Soldier: Regeneration, which ignores the events of The Return, should have passed by without any notice, but because it’s actually really rather good it developed a bit of a following. ITV4 seem to show it loads and it is well worth catching

It breathed new life into a long thought dead franchise so when talk got around to a UniSol 4 with Hyams back in the saddle again, there was understandably a lot of eager anticipation. Especially by me.

When Scott Adkins was announced as the new lead actor for UniSol 4 it became obvious that JCVD and Lundgren were not going to be either the focus of this movie or have that long on screen. Again this was in part because they were both off shooting some movie with Stallone and the Stath and some Austrian ex-politician. Still I was happy, I’m a fan of Adkins. He’s a very good English martial artist who’s made some pretty good movies (Undisputed II & III, Ninja). It was being filmed in 3D so that got people excited about a possible cinema release (sadly that didn’t really happen). On set pictures turn up, some rough plot synopsis arrive and this time it looks like JCVD’s character is no the baddie. Hhhhmmmm interesting.

Finally the film starts getting a release in the US. Reviews are awful. Fans even suggest that Universal Soldier: The Return is better than what they’ve been served up. Reasons for the hate seem to be that JCVD and Lundgren barely appear, there’s no or little action, takes a long time for anything to happen etc. All the excitement about seeing the movie dissipates away.

But

The trailer still looks pretty good (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPcMKd_73Ys). And surely it can’t be THAT bad. The odd decent review starts creeping in. Vern (a brilliant movie reviewer btw) on his website outlawvern.com thinks the film is pretty awesome. A few others like the fact it’s a bit different. My expectations of the movie are reduced somewhat, which works in my favour because when I finally see it, the film is pretty bloody good. Okay there are some problems with it. There isn’t really that much action in it but then that is because this isn’t really an action movie. Hyams this time around has made a thriller/psychological horror movie all about cloning and implanted memories that has a couple of action scenes in it. Some of the acting isn’t Oscar worthy but then this is a low budget movie. There are also two scenes with really strong strobing effects and white noise. They serve a purpose but for me went on to long and can definitely bring on a migraine or even a fit if you were that sensitive to flickering lights. On the plus side though the story is really quite engaging. The quite disturbing opening scene is brilliant and really screws with your perceptions of what the film is going to be like and as things unfold I found you really get into the plot. There’s some nice ‘Oh sh*t’ moments as Scott Adkins’s character uncovers more and more about himself and his past as he journeys into his own heart of darkness to find JCVD’s character who appears to have gone a little Colonel Kurtz and has an army of UniSols with him. The film is just under two hours and for me is perfectly paced. There’s plenty of character development and all the action/violence spins out of that. Which just really makes it better. Because let me tell you once the action kicks in it’s really good. There’s a great car chase that leads into an awesome fight between Adkins and Arlovski where they are battering each other with metal baseball bats and again the film climaxs with a long sustained kill-a-thon action scene (glimpsed in the trailer) where Adkins goes all John Matrix and kills everything is fantastic. His fights with Lundgren and JCVD are also pretty darn good too. Looking back on it you realise that okay it’s not as immediately impressive as Regeneration but then some of that is because it is so different to what you were expecting from a straight to video movie. This has by far the most interesting and engaging script of any of the UniSol movies. Yeah okay it’s a bit action-lite compared to the other movies but the action that is in it is pretty f**king awesome and surely it means a lot more because there has been a dramatic build up to the violence rather than just fight scene, bit of chat, fight scene, bit of chat etc. Not that I want to sound like I don’t like movies like that, I do but I’m glad they tried to make a movie that was more than that. It’s a shame to me that so many people seem to have hated this film. Because of that it does look like a potential fifth movie will probably not happen, which is a huge shame as this film has opened up all sorts of potential future plots.

This isn’t going to be everyone’s cup of tea. It’s very different to the other films in the franchise which for some will be a big red warning sign whereas for others it will be a welcome relief. You are definitely not watching a tired retread of the previous movie that I can guarantee you. I really enjoyed this and hope more of you out there do too.

SKYFALL - movie review

First of all I have just got to get this off my chest. OMG Daniel Craig runs funny in Skyfall. Not sure what’s happened to him in the last four years since QoS but he looks really strange now. Even more so than Tom Cruise when he runs fast. Very strange. Right, good, glad I’ve got that off my chest.

Right pretty much everyone has seen it so this isn’t going to be a massive review, more a collection of my thoughts about the movie. Brace yourself

Skyfall is by far the best Bond movie Daniel Craig has been in. I have niggles which I’ll go to in a moment, which really aren’t that big a deal when the overall movie is so good.

Please be aware that there will be spoilers and some big ones at that so if you’ve not watched Skyfall I suggest you read no further until you have. Otherwise this review might just piss you off a little.

The script for this movie is pretty awesome brining in a great villain in the shape of Javier Bardem. His first scene with Bond is a joy to behold with some wonderful verbal sparring and even some flirting, which is just cracking stuff. There’s a little bit of a lull in the first half of the movie until Bardem makes an appearance but nothing to make you drop off to sleep over. Judi Dench as M is rather wonderful too, they have made her character so important to these new Bond films that the decision to kill her off at the end does seem a bit mystifiying to me and even makes me ponder whether that is a HUGE mistake. However when you think that the replacement is Ralph Fiennes, who is introduced in this film as the character of Mallory, you do think that perhaps it isn’t. Dench’s scenes with both Craig and Bardem are superbly written and played to the hilt by the actors. The music in the film is a little bit of a mixed bag. Thankfully we finally get some Bond theme in some of the action and at other various places which is awesome but I did find overall the score for this film a bit erratic overblown for my tastes. At times the music get very mellow dramatic and was not a patch on the scores David Arnold has produced in the previous five movies. Bring him back for the next one please.

Skyfall opens brilliantly with a fantastic action scene, laced with some nice humour. Craig has got comfortable now as Bond and it shows as he effortlessly flits between hard bastard and smooth talker. Something that he was not so good at in the first two movies. the opening scene seagues beautifully into the opening song by Adele which is wonderful. After this is does get a bit talky and this is the slow part until Bardem makes an appearance. Once he’s on screen things really kick off and build up a head of steam to a rather fun ‘Straw Dogs’ like ending. Cinematography is stunning, this could be the best looking Bond film ever made. The aforementioned actors are all at the top of their game and have been expertly directed by Sam Mendes. Sadly where Mendes lets himself down for me is in the action stakes.

After the superb opening action scene and one stunningly shot fight in a room of glass the rest of the action for me was all a bit ordinary. Nothing really got me excited. The Straw Dogs lite ending was particularly disappointing and whoever decided that Craig and Bardem wouldn’t have a proper toe to toe punch up at the end needs to be fucking shot. The whole film seemed to be building up to these two brilliant agents having a final confrontation, a Skywalker Vs Vader if you will and what happens. Bond throws a knife in his back and Bardem staggers a bit and drops dead. That definitely annoyed the fuck out of me. So if Mendes is gonna be hired for the next film, please for the love of 007 hire an action director for the other bits because you only have to look again at Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace to see the action scenes in those film piss all over anything in Skyfall. Bond needs awesome action. This one just doesn’t have it for me.

Another thing that ticked me off is having the gun barrel scene at the end of the film. This to me is a totally pointless place to have it as I always found the gun barrel bits got me excited for the film I was about to watch. It’s the warm up act before we go into the pre-credits bit. This is a teeny niggle but I want that feeling of being a kid watching a Bond movie.

So I found the action disappointing but the rest of the film is so good that I can live with some not so awesome action. But because of that I can’t say this is the best Bond film ever as a lot of other reviews would have it. It’s better than Casino and Quantum but just imagine if this one had had some the terrific action of those films in it. Oooh now that would be amazing. Still ultimately this does the best thing it can do. It makes you really excited for the next movie, which seeing as this one has taken more money than any other Bond film in history means they’ll probably be getting their skates on now. Roll on 18th February when Skyfall is out on DVD and roll on Bond 24

DREDD - Film Review

Pretty much following a day on the job for Judge Dredd (Karl Urban) this has the eponymous Judge tasked with evaluating rookie Cassandra Anderson (Olivia Thirlby) as a training day to see if she’s got what it takes to be a street judge. Anderson is also a psychic, one of the reasons the Chief Judge wants to see how she’ll cope ‘in the field’. Dredd takes the rookie out and tells her to choose where they are going. Anderson picks an incident at the megablok Peach Trees, three skinned bodies have been thrown from one of the 200 floors and landed in the main ground floor planade. This is to start a series of events which will see the two Judges locked into the megablok and facing a war against hundreds of criminals tasked with killing them by the ruthless crime lord, Ma-Ma (Lena Headley).


The last time Judge Dredd was ‘attempted’ for a film version we got the beyond terrible Sylvester Stallone version back in 1995. They totally got the character wrong on nearly every level and possibly the most important one is that Dredd’s face is never seen, one of the main points is that he is the ‘faceless’ face of Justice in the futuristic city, Mega City One. Stallone took the helmet off after the first ten minutes and things got progressively worse from there. Joel Schumacher didn’t f**k up Batman as much as Stallone f**Ked up Dredd. Let us never mention that film again.


So fast forward to 2012 and we get a new version, written by lifelong Dredd fan Alex Garland. Thankfully the years have been kind and we have been served up THE Dredd movie. Yes you can quibble about that fact that Mega City One is totally different to its depiction in the comic books. It’s not a massively over the top, giant buildings crowding around each other metropolis, it looks more like a giant city of today with some giant buildings spread out across it. The costumes that the Judges wear are very different to the comic book depiction. There are a couple of reasons for this. One is the film’s budget was $45 million, which for a film of this ilk is really, really low budget. The other is down to the fact that nowadays, especially after the success of Batman Begins and Iron Man it seems setting these comic book movies in a ‘realistic’ world are a bit of the in thing. To be fair this actually works in the movie’s favour, making this world much more accessible to the casual Dredd fan such as myself and the non-Dredd fan that has yet to delve into this world of Judges etc. Oh and the new Judge costume’s kick arse.


Sticking to a very lean and mean plot line this steamrollers along at a terrific pace, building up on elements of this world as we go. The violence is very bloody and nasty, there are people getting shot to bits, blown up and skinned alive. The characters are pretty much spot on as far as I can tell. Thirlby as Anderson is the films heart and soul. She is the rookie Judge who still can feel compassion and regret and is the perfect foil for Urban. Taking away his eyes, for Dredd never, NEVER EVER, takes that helmet off means that his performance relies on the rest of his body. The way he moves, talks, the type of voice he has. And he is Dredd. Totally and unequivocally focused on the letter of the law. He is a near immoveable object. When told that Anderson only just failed and they feel there is a question over whether she should be given another chance Dredd’s response is a terse “She failed”. Despite the fact that you could call Dredd a ‘fascist b*stard’ or even a ‘total c*nt’ which to be fair he kind of is, he’s still a riveting character and the film is never quite as good when he’s off-screen.


This was my first 3D movie since Avatar and I have to say I was really impressed. Okay it’s not 3D fantastic like Avatar but the scenes where the 3D really do improve this movie and make it something special are the scenes involving people taking a new narcotic know as ‘Slo-Mo’. This drug makes the world move at about 1% of its normal speed, allowing for some awesome shots of a person splashing in the bath or in one jaw dropping scene, watching Dredd and Anderson take down a ‘Slo-Mo’ drug den with bullets tearing bodies apart and showering blood in all directions. In slow motion. In 3D. Love it.


I really hope that this film does well so that we can get more movies made. Not only is it pretty much an Independent British film but Urban’s performance as Dredd is so good I just want to see him play this role again and from the sounds of it the film makers plans for sequels sound too good to not see. I would gladly go and see this film again and again at the cinema, not something I’ve thought of doing for quite some years now. It’s not a date movie and it sure is very violent, and gorily violent at that, but for me, this is by far the best comic book adaption since 300.

THE EXPENDABLES 2 - film review

Coerced into doing a job for Mr Church (Bruce Willis) after the previous job (see The Expendables) went a bit sour, Barney Ross’s (Sylvester Stallone) Expendables find themselves on the wrong side of dastardly Jean Vilain (Jean-Claude Van Damme) and Hector (Scott Adkins), leaders of a team of mercenaries who are after stock piled nuclear weapons. Following the death of one of the Expendables Ross’s plan is simple, “Find ‘em, Track ‘em, Kill ‘em”. You know it’s gonna get noisy when you hear lines like that.

Finally being able to get out to the cinema after over a year was a joyous occasion and what better movie to share it with than this, the follow up to one of the most fun actioners of recent years and this time Stallone has worked his magic and got not only Jean-Claude Van Damme (JCVD) and Chuck Norris in, he’s also got Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis to play much larger roles than the one scene in the first movie. Be warned what follows may contain so teeny tiny spoilers but nothing I think that would spoil anyone’s enjoyment of the movie.

Let’s start with the bad. A similar problem from the first film is carried over, sadly. There are rather too many guys in the mix. Jet Li sadly gets lost again, only appearing in the opening action scene before he departs, hopefully to make a come back in movie number 3. Couture and Crews again suffer from a dearth of screen time but thankfully Dolph Lundgren is on good form, as is JCVD who is obviously having a ball playing the villain of the piece. Both Stallone and The Stath (Jason Statham) are on top form too, but more on that later. The storyline is pretty thin, possibly thinner than the first film, although that also is kind of a strength. Less time on plot means more time on blowing things up. There’s also a couple of bits with some not quite brilliant CGI, lets just say Motorbike Vs helicopter and Plane Vs Bridge and you’ll see what I mean. However in the films defence this film cost $100 million which in today’s Big Blockbuster Movie club is pretty cheap and when you think some of the guys in this usually command near $20 million for their fee alone I think I can live with a bit of not Avatar quality CGI in a couple of bits if it means they can get this cast on the screen.

There’s a very different feel to this movie. The tone is not as serious as the first movie. There are a lot more jokes and in-jokes about the cast and it all feels a bit more of a romp at times than a serious action pic. I quite liked the feel of it and it in no way detracts from the action bits (patience I’m getting there) although I would say I hope come the next film that they won’t make it quite so jokey and get a bit more serious.

Right we’ve got the boring bits out of the way. Let’s get on to the main reason you want to see a film like this. The action. Just like the first movie this doesn’t disappoint. The opening of the film has a nice big action scene with lots of explosions and shooting and Jet Li having a fantastic fight scene, better than anything he was allowed to do in the first movie. Sadly for us that’s it for him in this movie as he departs soon after although it’s nice to see Dolph’s character looking genuinely heartbroken when Li says he may not be back. A nice turnaround for these two characters after what happened with them in the first movie. Things slow down a little after that but pick up once JCVD and his henchman Hector played by rather superb British martial artist Scott Adkins arrive. Watching Adkins’ character punk out and make The Stath his bitch is quite superb to see, especially as Stath was pretty much the manliest of men in the first film. You so know when these two meet again it’s going to be pretty special (and OOOOOOH it is, knife versus knuckle dusters is all I’m saying). Bringing in Chuck Norris for a couple of bits is great fun, especially as Norris comes out with a blooming Chuck Norris fact. Brilliant. It’s also rather good to have Arnie back in the mix. Watching him get to shoot some baddies and shout “I’m back” is a cheer worthy moment, indeed a few people in the screening did cheer. Stallone and JCVD make perfect adversaries to one another and their fight, albeit a tad on the short side is pretty darn good. Great to see JCVD in a cinema film again (fingers crossed the new Universal Soldier movie which also has Scott Adkins and Dolph Lundgren in gets a cinema release) and he revels in every second, his villain is perfect old school Bond baddie.

This isn’t a perfect film but if you want an action film that is just totally and unashamedly fun then this is truly Fifty Shades of F**king Awesome. Roll on The Expendables 3 which apparently already has the existing cast signed up as well as newbies Nic Cage and potentially Clint Eastwood and maybe, finally Steven Seagal. Bring. It. On.

Quentin tarantino & Me - A Love Story

My ongoing love-hate relationship with Quentin Tarantino is well documented amongst my friends. You only have to ask the cast of my school production of Once in a Lifetime when I portrayed a mad German film director to know that there was a time when I obsessed about QT. Pulp Fiction still stands the test of time as a terrific film but also holds a special place in my heart because it opened my eyes to films that were all about the dialogue. Way before I got into Elmore Leonard books, a writer who so obviously informed QT’s dialogue style no end, this was the one that made me go WOW. There’s not a massive plot, there’s not much ‘action’ but there is a hell of a lot of talking and damn doesn’t it just sound so cool. I was at school and was getting into writing stage scripts. QT really got me into writing, and mainly trying to get some great dialogue. Not necessarily in the same style but good dialogue, maybe even ‘cool’ dialogue. I devoured Reservoir Dogs when it eventually emerged onto VHS (this was in the day when it was pretty much banned on video), Jackie Brown I really enjoyed but it wasn’t quite as good as Pulp Fiction (though it did have the coolest actor on the planet Samuel L Jackson in it) but then things got tricky when Kill Bill came out. I should be a bit more precise, Kill Bill Volume 1. On paper this sounded like a great idea. Tarantino was going to make a throw back to the exploitation revenge movies that he grew up loving, with Uma Thurman as a kick ass female assassin going after the men who tried to kill her, all leading up to the big man, Bill. This sounded great. Then came the news that the film was soooooooo long they were going to split it into two films. Okay that didn’t sound brilliant. Most exploitation revenge movies were short and sweet, nearer 90 minutes than 240 but hey it’s Tarantino. What could go wrong? Quite a f**king lot in my opinion. Kill Bill was a huge damp squib. Within minutes of the film beginning alarm bells were ringing in my head. Did he really just have a bleep over one of the characters talking? A name bleeped out? That’s a bit pants. As the film went on the idea that this was fast paced action film of the two (as all the pre-publicity kept droning on and on about) became more and more bullsh*t. The film is pedestrian paced, only really coming alive for the final slaughter-a-thon at the end, which admittedly is pretty superb. I left the cinema feeling very let down. Apart from a couple of bits it wasn’t really very good. I bypassed Volume 2 at the cinema and watched it on dvd. It’s better but still beset by problems. The ‘death list 5’ which is so prevalent in the first film isn’t mentioned, the complete change to more of a western style is quite jarring and it’s just overall a bit ‘meeh’. Again there are some great moments. Uma Thurman’s fight with Daryl Hannah is fantastic and the final, downbeat finale with Bill is quite nicely played. It’s just not great. I was distraught, here was my idol who’d made three terrific films and now for his fourth it was, well ordinary. After this I joked that any future film would be his ongoing apology for Kill Bill. Up pops Death Proof. After hunting down the script online (I say hunting down, it was more a case of put it in google search and there it is) I had a read. This was much, much better than Kill Bill but although there was some great dialogue the films plot was a bit weak. The film basically consists of (spoilersspoilerspoilers) a group of girls meet up, go to a bar and talk. A lot. A creepy man sees them there, gets a lap dance off one of them then when the girls leave he crashes his car into them killing them all but survives himself because his car is a stunt car and he was protected by roll cage etc. Another group of girls meet up and talk, a lot. Creepy guy tries to kill them but the tables are turned and the girls chase him and eventually beat him to death. That is pretty much what happens. So no great shakes storywise. I know neither was Pulp Fiction but it had more to it than this. Seeing the film however was completely different. Sure the story is the same but on screen it all works so much better. But it still wasn’t great. QT had gone up a fair few notches but hadn’t yet retained the pedestal I’d put him on in my teens. Which brings me to Inglourious Basterds, QT’s spaghetti western styled World War II movie. Again I hunted down the script online and gave it a read. I was a little disappointed. After being promised a ‘men on a mission’ movie ala The Dirty Dozen this was anything but. The ‘Basterds’ of the title are barely in the movie and the main chunk of the film is about a Jewish girl working in a cinema. There were a couple of great scenes but overall it was a bit of a ‘meh’ script when reading it. All the good work QT had done with Death Proof was about to be crushed. Then I went to the cinema to see it. There are a few differences in the finished movie to the script but it just comes alive on screen, thanks mainly to two actors. Brad Pitt and one Christoph Waltz. Pitt looks like he is having a ball as Aldo Raine the leader of the ‘Basterds’ and as for Waltz, well his Hans Landa is one of the most fantastic creations imaginable. He is truly stunning. The film could do with being trimmed here and there in each scene in my opinion but it is as close to Pulp Fiction as QT has got. A lot of people have even labelled it his masterpiece but I think they were jumping the gun. They haven’t seen Django Unchained yet. To be fair neither have I. It’s not due out in the US until December and unlikely to open in the UK until January 2013. What I have done is read the script. And it is good. It is really, really good. It’s easily his best since Pulp Fiction. He’s created two superb characters in Django, a freed slave and Dr King Schultz, an ex-dentist turned Bounty Hunter and the footage that was screened in Cannes earlier this week has had a glowing reception. If the film is anyway near as good as the written script, and with Waltz taking the role of King Schultz and a certain Mr Leonardo Di Caprio making is QT bow as a villain this surely will be something to behold. Without wanting to jinx it, this could be his masterpiece. So QT you’re back on the pedestal. Maybe I don’t obsess or worship you like I did when I was a teen but you’re back to making some pretty damn good movies. And I’ll salute you for that.

BATTLEFIELD 3: THE RUSSIAN - BOOK REVIEW

Based on the computer game this is more of a side story than a straight novelisation of the game (so I have heard), which actually works to the advantage. This is mainly because pretty much every novelisation of a computer game I’ve ever read is pretty much an entertaining piece of rubbish. This breaks that mould somewhat by actually being a pretty decent thriller, even more so, despite being ‘co-authored’ this very much reads like an Andy McNab book so as a fan you are well catered for. The lead character of the novel is an ex-Spetsnaz soldier Dima Mayakovsky who ends up hunting down a suitcase WMD in the middle east, encountering a US marine Sergeant Henry Blackburn, the central character in the computer game, along his travels. Like all of McNab’s other novels this blast along with breakneck speed as bad situation is compounded by worse situations and just plain terrible ones. Being a fan of McNab’s Nick Stone thrillers I found this equally entertaining and it was nice to find the author writing about a Russian central character than the usual English or American, as we normally see in these sorts of books. Despite having the potential stigmata of being based on a game I think this book would stand up pretty well without the Battlefield 3 links as a good military thriller. There’s plenty of big action scenes and some great dialogue as well as a brilliant lead character in Mayakovsky and I would rate this alongside any of his Stone books. I have a slight niggle with part of the climax, which I can’t really go into as that would be a bit of a spoiler, but this didn’t annoy me enough to sully my enjoyment of the book. I would love to read more books about this character although I would expect this would be unlikely to happen. Not being a massive gamer I find myself actually wanting to give the game a go after reading this. I sincerely hope that the gamers’ out there will want to give the book a go after playing the game.